New York Times “Room for Debate” Post
I was just plain delighted to have been invited to participate in one of the “Room for Debate” forums with the New York Times. The question we were asked to address:
“If more couples considered monogamy optional, would divorce and cheating be less common, and unmarried cohabitation less attractive?”
Here’s a link to the front page; here, you can find my individual entry, which looks at alternative forms of relationship recognition (such as civil unions) as a way to refresh the debate about expectations within relationships. But the whole debate is fascinating.